Paradoxical Twins Acme and Omega Electronics

Case Study on Paradoxical Twins blossom And zee Electronics By ABC Paradoxical Twins Acme And Omega Electronics Defining the issue After reading the fictional character of the Paradoxical Twins Acme and Omega Electronics, I found Both Acme and Omega go similar products and offer similar services. Acme president John Tyler is a very tough acquittance individual and he is portrayed to be an autocratic individual because at that place is one way chat in Acme. The gaucherie provides an opportunity to evaluate both(prenominal) Acme and Omegas government activity grammatical construction of a business.Both companies used to stomach the uniform brassal structure that after they were sold to diametrical investors, as a consequence of this, each company has its aver procedures and company policies. Following atomic number 18 the same facts about both the company mentioned in the case after they became the separate business entity. Acme maintained accepted worry and promot ed GM to the president. They pee-pee healthy maked organizational structureand conclusivenesss are oft taken by top management without consulting manufacturing department.And they havewell defined job responsibilities and authority. Omega hired a new president and upgraded several existing personnel deep down the plant. They dont have the organizational structure and they believe thatOrganizational chart seems like artificial barrier. They have a participative management style of leadership and they dont have well defined job specification. Acme has shipped the deoxycytidine monophosphate prototypes on 2 shifts, and 20% ofthese units were found defective. While Omega has shipped the100 units on time, and no defective items weredetected.Despite of these facts, and although, as seen in the previous section,Omega was more than effective than Acme, the photocopier manufacturer decided to split the final contract amidstAcme and Omega, under the conditions of maintaining zero defe cts and lowering the final courtJustifications of this decision could be 1-Acme retained the authentic structure of Technological Products of Erie, and has been adapted to be an Omega in profitable contracts in the past. This has formed a good reputation for Acme that might have contributed in giving them a chance to have a ortion of this contract. 2- Acmes price was slightly lower than Omegas, and since the photocopier manufacturer have conditioned richly quality, I t might have been more profitable to chooseAcme as well as Omega. 3-Omega was not rejected because that would be unethical and may be illegal since they met the deadline and provided high quality inputs to photocopier manufacturer. At Acme The high formality of coordination, and thetall hierarchy of the organizational chart, has affected the way activities were being done.The almost important effects enkindle be summarized as follows 1-Little information was communicated to the organization as a unanimous and bet ween different departments. 2-Lack of motivation, as some managers voiced. 3-Some inertia against trying new methods of serve existed. 4-Coordination between divisions was not high enough that some important decisions were wrongly taken. At Omega 1-Due to the passing informal fashion work was being done in,employees had an ambiguous view of their own roles. 2-Information sharing was high among all levels, with sometimes caused a waste of time. -Innovative thinking was encouraged. 4-The work washighly collaborative Analyzing the case entropy The paradoxical twins describe cardinal organizations, Acme and OmegaElectronics thatare competing for the same contract for manufacturing a memory unit to be used in a photocopier. Omega, having an organic structure, wins the race because they are able to evolve the higher quality memory unit. On the other hand, Acme having mechanistic structure seems little copent and less reliable because of its low quality memory unit which they are un able to produce in time and some of its prototypes fail to work.Omega even corrects a design error in the original blueprint, which improves product quality. But, both the company is accustomed half the order, and they were encouraged to find the way to reduce the costand Acme takes advantage of this opportunity to experiment to find ways to reduce its costs, whereas Omega does not. Finally Acme discovers the way to reduce the cost by 20% and they won the contract. Omega may have won the battle, but Acme has won the war because its mechanistic structure fosters a concern for technical readiness and cost reduction in what is a routine manufacturing environment.In this particular case, Acme decides to run a derisory ship (mechanistic structure) in order to increase productivity and efficiency, and to decrease costs. The advantage of this strategy is that they can under dilute their competition (Omega) by selling at a lower cost. Omega, on the other hand, is nearly likewise opposit e. They run a more organic structure, which relies heavily upon communication, delegation and teamwork. This strategy allows Omega to effectively compete with Acme by stressing reliability and by placing emphasis on quality.Omegas decentralised, organic approach allowed for the building of prototypes 10 days faster than Acme, correction of errors, and a highly reliable prototypemuch more reliable than Acmes, which had a 10 percent failure rate. Omega was more effective when evaluated by these criteria, although Acmes prices were lower than Omegas because of that Acme won the competition and which was a fairly result in my opinion. Its mechanistic structure provided it with the management system and incentives needed to improve and reduce its manufacturing process, so that Acme won the final race over Omega.Generating alternatives * Change in the organizational structure of both companies is needed. * Development and adaptation of new technology and techniques is required in both co mpanies. * There should be a multifariousness in the workflow of the companies. * The merger of both companies is in like manner an option open for both companies. Selecting decision criteria Selection criteria for the alternatives is performance and working style along with organization structure is adopted to find and cheer the alternatives. Analyzing and evaluating alternativesSome changes can be made at both plants that would increase efficiency of work and hence resurrect their competitive advantage against each other. Selecting the preferred alternative Alternative-1Change in structure Omega is a decentralized organization, where managers and subordinates delegate important decisions to lower level about new organizational projects. Omegas management believes in vulgar adjustment, which is the practice of using judgment on problem solving and also creates an informal way of communication with each other rather than using standardization or written rules.There is not clea r cut job analysis (job description and specification). Sometime new employees dont know what to do for a month and even longer. Omegas organic structure gives the employees more flexibility to innovative thinking, and creates a unity indoors the organization but it is not enough to be the effective organization. Omega should have mix organization structure it means it would be better if there is a mix of mechanical and organic organization structure.There should be a formal communication channel to make sure that information is passed down or up whenever necessary. In my opinion, the company President Jim Rawls doesnt have proper control over the employees functions and activities due to the lack of properly designed structure and communication profits. They communicate information by compute meeting which is not good all the time especially during the rush time. Not only this, but also, the president spent too much time on listening to suggestion rather than having his own clea r cut idea.Therefore, in conclusion, to solve this kind of problem they should have transparent communication network within the organization to make sure there are no barriers in effective communication, they should define the job authority and responsibility of each task, there should be some chain of command in the organization or the top level management should decide in certain things which critical to the organization. They should change the structure to mechanistic structure and finally they should change their technology to mass production so that they also can reduce the cost of production and be more competitive in the market place.To be effective, Omega electronics should have some kind of hierarchy where employees feel themselves in the chain of command and there should be clear authority and responsibility of each employee. They should make sure that they communication channel within the organization is effective and transparent for the efficient and prompt flow of info rmation. Alternative- 2 Merger In the case of Acme andOmega, the high level of competitions seems to be the main incentive for both plants to strive excellence, once they merge, this motivator will vanish.Another problem that might arise is a span cultural conflict between members of the twoplants. At Acme, every role is clearly defined, and the specialization level is high, while at Omega, roles are transmit among members and specialization is not that high, conciliating such differences will be ahectic job. If those two issues were overcome, combining the well defined structure that Acme holds and the skills of its workers, with flexibility and the innovative nature of work that Omega provides,An Acme Omega merger would be a successful one and a great competitor to other plants in their industry Developing an action/implementation planAt Acme I would be of great benefit of cross functional teams were introduced into the structure to handle jobs such as the one in this case stud y. It would also be a great motivator and boosterof quality of work ifmanagers as well as specialists were given some open space to share their view collectively rather than the unidirectional channels that are adopted at Acme. This willalso need a higher level of coordination between departments. fundament should also be highly encouraged, due to the high pace of change and introduction of new products in Acmesindustry.At Omega The informal nature of the structure seems to be working fine,except that it needs a here and now of formalization andclarification ofpeoples roles. This structure was a point of strength for Omega in this bid however, it wont work for other tasks that need faster accomplishments of the activities. For example, instead ofexchanging opinions and suggestions most of the time, this can be organized using information sharing systems that centralized data that everyone in the organization needs.